---
title: Feedback
description: We solicit individuals we believe have a lens into Recovery, as a sponsor, show host or an individual that has long term recovery, we value your honest feedback.
---

[![Reflection Recovery](https://www.reflectionrecovery.org/hs-fs/hubfs/reflection%20logo-1.png?height=64&name=reflection%20logo-1.png)](https://www.reflectionrecovery.org?hsLang=en)

Reflection Recovery

# Reviewer Feedback

Where you stand determines what you see.

For podcasters, practitioners, and peer reviewers. Short on purpose: the countable answers are choices, so the totals mean something later.

17 questions

## About you

You are reviewing as \*

- Podcaster / host
- Practitioner / recovery centre
- Peer reviewer
- Other

First name \*

Last name \*

Show / organisation

Email (optional — only if you are happy to be contacted about your feedback)

Name is kept on record and is not shown if you choose anonymous below, and never shown if you choose private.

## The method

 Spatial disambiguation is noticing where attention stands, especially in the space between a trigger and a reaction. The method rests on Knowledge (cataloguing the objective truth of your history), Acceptance (an expanded, stable capacity to hold that data without flinching, running, or self-loathing), and Humility (the capacity for knowledge in the future-tense self).

How do you see the Reflection framework being used? \*

- As a standalone path
- As a complement alongside other approaches

Which part holds the highest practical utility? \*

- Spatial disambiguation
- Knowledge / Acceptance / Humility
- The space between trigger and reaction
- Other (please say below)

If other, what?

How have you encountered the method?

- Read the full book, *Reflection*
- Read the free excerpt
- Heard a podcast discussion of it
- Reviewed a summary / outline only

Clarity, 1–5

- 1 — unclear
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5 — very clear

Practical utility, 1–5

- 1 — not useful
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5 — very useful

Would you use or recommend it?

- Yes
- Maybe, with changes
- No

If maybe or no, what would need to change?

What was least clear, or your biggest concern?

This is as useful as the positive side — please be direct.

What is the most significant shift this method offers? \*

One or two sentences is plenty.

## Consent

How may we use your feedback? \*

- Quote me by name — name and show/org may appear with my answer.
- Anonymous only — quote my answer without my name or org.
- Private — count me in the totals only. Do not quote me.

Marketing and press releases: I also agree Reflection Recovery may use my feedback in marketing content and press releases, under the quote choice above — with my name and show/org if I chose named, without them if I chose anonymous, and never if I chose private.

- Yes
- No

Left unticked, your feedback is only counted and quoted on the site as chosen above. It will not appear in marketing or press releases.

[Share your feedback →](https://forms.reflectionrecovery.com/197894)

Thank you — your feedback has been recorded.  
*Your life is worth more.*